Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǿ¡¼­ ¿Ï¾ÐÇü ÀÚ¼º ¾îÅÂÄ¡¸ÕÆ®¸¦ ºÎÂøÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ®-ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡ ÇÇ°³ ÀÇÄ¡: 10³â Áõ·Êº¸°í

Mandibular implant-natural tooth retained overdenture using magnetic attachment with stress breaker

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2015³â 31±Ç 4È£ p.378 ~ 386
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÀºÃ¶:Park Eun-Chul À̼ö¿¬:Lee Su-Yeon/±èÈñÁß:Kim Hee-Jung

Abstract

ÇÇ°³ ÀÇÄ¡´Â ÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤°ú À¯Áö·Â Áõ°¡¶ó´Â ÀåÁ¡À» °®Áö¸¸ Áö´ëÄ¡°¡ ¿ì½Ä ¶Ç´Â Ä¡ÁÖÁúȯ¿¡ ÀÌȯµÇ±â ½¬¿ì¸ç ÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ ¾ã¾ÆÁüÀ¸·Î½á ÀÇÄ¡°¡ ÆÄÀýµÇ±â ½±´Ù´Â ´ÜÁ¡µµ °®°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÚ¼º ¾îÅÂÄ¡¸ÕÆ® ÇÇ°³ ÀÇÄ¡´Â ¼öÁ÷Àû À¯Áö·ÂÀº Å©Áö¸¸ ¼öÆòÀû À¯Áö·ÂÀº ÀÛÀ¸¹Ç·Î Áö´ëÄ¡³ª ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ´ú À§ÇØÇÑ ÈûÀ» °¡Çϸç, ´Ù¸¥ ±â°èÀû À¯ÁöÀåÄ¡¿¡ ºñÇØ ¸¶¸ð³ª ÆļյîÀÌ Àû´Ù´Â ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÇ°³ ÀÇÄ¡¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ ÆÄÀýÀº ÀÇÄ¡»óÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ ¾ã¾ÆÁ®¼­ ¹ß»ýÇϱ⵵ ÇÏÁö¸¸, ¿¬Á¶Á÷°ú °æÁ¶Á÷, ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡ÀÇ ¾ÐÇÏ·® Â÷ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß»ýÇϱ⵵ ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ º¸»óÇϱâ À§ÇØ silicone ballÀÌ ÀÚ¼® ¾È¿¡ »ðÀԵǾîÀÖ´Â ÀÚ¼º ¾îÅÂÄ¡¸ÕÆ®°¡ °³¹ßµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ ÇÇ°³ ÀÇÄ¡¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÑ Áõ·Ê¿¡¼­ ¿ì¼öÇÑ °á°ú°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª º¸°í ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

Overdenture has the advantage of improving the stability and retention of the denture but the abutment may be easily affected by caries or periodontal disease and the thin denture can be easily broken. The magnetic attachment overdenture has a high vertical retention but a low horizontal retention, thus, exerting a less disruptive force to the abutment or implant and shows less abrasion or damage compared to other mechanical retainers. Denture fractures in overdenture is caused by the thin denture base as the attachment is inserted, but it may also be caused by the difference in detrusion between soft tissue and hard tissue, and between an implant and a natural tooth. To compensate this shortcoming, a magnetic attachment with a silicone ball inserted in the magnet was developed as we report a successful case using this specific type of magnetic attachment overdenture.

Å°¿öµå

ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡; ¿Ï¾ÐÇü; ÀÚ¼º ¾îÅÂÄ¡¸ÕÆ®
overdenture; magnet; stressbreaker

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI